The first book on the Old West that I owned was Lea McCarty’s The Gunfighters; how accurate is it?

The first book on the Old West that I owned was Lea McCarty’s The Gunfighters; how accurate is it?

John Redshaw, Maniac #776

St.Paul, Alberta, Canada

I have a copy of Gunfighters, too. Since it came out in 1959, a lot of the material is dated and lists some of the myths as facts. For example, McCarty says Billy the Kid killed 21 men; we know that wasn’t true. He says Johnny-Behind-the-Deuce O’Rourke killed Johnny Ringo, which is not likely (most folks think it was suicide). The author refers to the McLaury brothers as “McLowery,” which was commonly done in the 1950s. Still, McCarty is pretty accurate with a lot of things, and the book is a good read for short biographical sketches. Overall, McCarty’s paintings (the real feature of the book) were a good likeness to the actual gunfighters. He had most of them packing two six-shooters, however, and that was more reel West than real West.

Related Posts

  • wildwest

    AGES 5-15: Creating a book which accurately relates the history of “Going West” from Boone…

  • west_of_here

    West of Here, by Jonathan Evison, is a five-generation saga that begins with the arrival…

  • seventrailswest

    If a student of the exploration and expansion of the American West were to have…